Atik Cameras

Author Topic: M106  (Read 14259 times)

MikeM

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 158
    • myastroimages.com
M106
« on: April 15, 2012, 09:25:46 PM »
I started this on Friday night from my back yard because I wanted to work on some guiding issues I had when using a long focal length, 8RC. This time even though it appeared that the X&Y graphs were jumping around (much more than when using my FSQ) I believe I've gotten some decent results.
This is 9x10min subs only in Lum using an AT8RC, ATFF and the 383L+ on a G11 mount guided with the Atik OAG.
I plan on going back and getting more LUM and RGB.

Comments always welcome.



Clear Skies!!
Mike

FSQ106N - AT8RC
G-11

bwa

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 298
Re: M106
« Reply #1 on: April 15, 2012, 10:50:59 PM »
Great start on the LRGB image!

bwa

kevinsmithsky

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • How Do I Lose Belly Fat
Re: M106
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2012, 09:23:26 AM »
Yeah!its really a great start for you!

Lex

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 244
  • We do it at night...
Re: M106
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2012, 06:47:58 PM »
Nice one! Keep us in the loop withthe color version  8)

How many pixels did the graph jump around? I worry about this bloody all the times but infact even if it jumps up to 3 pixels, there is no need to worry  :D

Well done!

Best
CGEM, C11, TS Carbon Apo Triplet 90/600, TS Carbon UNC 254/1250, Atik 383l+, EFW2,
TSOAG, Lodestar....

MikeM

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 158
    • myastroimages.com
Re: M106
« Reply #4 on: April 19, 2012, 02:20:29 AM »
Thanks for the look bwa, Kevin & Lex. I use Maxim to image and guide and am used to seeing no more than +- .50 pixel max movement with my FSQ. But with the 8RC
it was more in the neighborhood of +-1-2 pixels which could have been caused by the seeing through a larger scope I would guess. I finally settled on 3 sec exposures
and an 8 aggressiveness in X & Y. Seemed to have worked well.
Clear Skies!!
Mike

FSQ106N - AT8RC
G-11